last comment by Shaz O.
over 4 years ago
Ronel Jibril O.
would you go to a person you love most? but can't love you back?OR?to a person who will surely love you, but you don't love that much?explain your answer why?!
over 5 years ago
Neither!!! Lol, I know that's an annoying answer but in cases of unrequited love why choose either?? If you're with someone who loves you when you know you don't/won't return their feelings, you're using them and run the risk of really hurting them. If you're with someone who doesn't love you and never will you're setting yourself up for unnecessary pain... Better too be on your own imo! xx
April 18, 2011
↓ back to reply
well theres always another option of someone who love u and u love back in it :P
To a person who will surely love you, but you don't love that much? My love for them will grow overtime, EVERYBODY WINS... yaaaaaaaay!
WHEREVER THERE'S A PARTY,
to the person that YOU love...you can always hope that things might work out and he'll get to love you as much as you do even if he hasn't given you signs that he can change.. i have done this before and i haven't regret it.. he may haven't treated me really great but at least i felt sth when i was him.. even if he didn't.
I'd be more prone to going for the person I loved. Even if it didn't work out. Only because I don't like kidding myself into thinking I like someone enough for a relationship to last, I've done it before and just made a huge mess.
Actually, I was in a situation pretty much like this about a year ago. It was a tough decision, but eventually I chose the person I wasn't sure if I loved but I knew they loved me and now I'm the happiest I've ever been. So if I had to choose again, I'd still go for the person who loves me but I don't love them so much. Because then I can still "learn" to love them more overtime when I spend more time with them, and then it's a win-win.
The first, even though that would be such a tragic situation for me. Then again, I could always just learn to love the other peson that I don't love that much.
April 22, 2011
NEW YORK, NY,
i guess i rather be a spinster and adopt a bunch of children.because both sound like suck-ass relationships
"I'd rather be a cat woman" was my first thought, but I would however go for the person to love me more, as i am too insecure and paranoid to not be sure if someone loves me back or not.
The first one..Love is always painful.The second option is not even a thought for me.I can only be with someone that i really love and like.
Person I love most but can't love me back. :)Reason? Because FOR ME, love isn't progressive. It's a status.It's either you love a person or you don't. So I think there's no such thing as "don't love that much".
April 23, 2011
Neither, im a free bitch baby!!!!!!!!!!
Neither. All I need is my guitar!
April 24, 2011
Neither, cause I know there is a better situation out there for me somewhere.
May 6, 2011
WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE,
Niether, It'd be a total waste of time either way and I'm not a fan of that.
pretty much, neither... but it's hurtful, for sure, to be with the one you don't love and never get to love the person as much as he/she loves you... for both sides
neither, not the first situation because if its that obvious she/he doesnt love you then then your just will get hurt. The second depends on whether you belief that ull never love that person or that your just unsure about it? if your unsure then i'd say give it a chance, u can always end it later when you do know for sure
I would probably choose the 1st out of blind devotion because I am like that
May 12, 2011
NEW YORK CITY,
I'm not one to fall in love, whoever I'm most attracted to I guess. But since I rather be liked more, then the second.
May 17, 2011
Ronel Jibril O.
WOOOW! thankss <3
January 25, 2012
Therese Isabelle D.
Neither. I'd rather wait for a person i love and that loves me back aswell then.
Neither, keep on looking. You need to be sure that the person you go after is right for you and it sounds like neither of those people are!
i think most people want an equal relationship. you know where you love each other the same. but in reality that never works. there is always someone who loves the other more. from my experiences you def want to be the one who is loved more. there is always a leader and a chaser. never be the chaser.
neither.it should always be equal.i'd rather be single than be with someone that i dont really love but really loves meor be inlove with someone who doesnt love me back.so much pain.i'll just wait for the person that will love me and i'll love back.
February 18, 2012
If I had to choose...I'd say someone I'm mildly fond of who loves me back. Loving someone who doesn't care so much about you hurts. So very much. But yeah as people are saying equal is always wonderful!
February 19, 2012
i wouldnt want to be in either positionbut i guess if i had to choose i would rather have the person love me.
February 27, 2012
Imperfect love > no love at all
well if you think with your brain,neither. but if you think with your heart,choose the second.i had some experience with that and i can tell you: you could learn,and you WILL learn to love the one that loves you,but if you love someone that doesn't love you back,you will be (almost) always unhappy.choose wisely.
IN YOUR FRIDGE ♥,
Neither, you should wait until you fall hopelessly in love with someone who has fallen helplessly in love with you.
March 5, 2012
I'll go for neither as well. In either of those situations, at least one of you is going to be unhappy.
March 6, 2012
to the person who loved me, because i would eventually fall in love with that person for loving me
March 7, 2012
Accepted HTML tags: <a href="url">link</a> <img src="image url"/> <br/>
You have no saved topics.
by Lookbook, featuring Melike Gül of Melike min stil gunlugu
by Lookbook, brought to you by Rich Honey Monthly
by Lookbook, featuring It's Julien
© 2008-2016 Lookbook. All rights reserved.